Quick Draw
I had some problems with my DVR last night so trying to watch the second Gubernatorial debate was a little difficult, but it really didn’t matter because nothing changed all that much. Both Mitch Daniels and Jill Long Thompson were a little more aggressive and Andy Horning was still Andy Horning. So here are my overall grades based on style, delivery and content.
- Mitch Daniels - B+, good on specifics and calling JLT’s facts on the carpet. Maybe a little too aggressive with one member of the audience.
- JLT - C/C+. You continued your attack on Daniels and added a couple more specifics to your plan for Indiana, but you still didn’t give voters a reason to switch.
- Andy Horning - B. Good performance, but when people are looking to government for answers telling them to look elsewhere might not be the best thing.
- The ultimate winner of this round was Daniels because in the end nothing changed and a tie goes to the incumbent.
September 24th, 2008 at 9:14 am
The only thing I learned about JLT was that she is a product of a small school, she is from a small town, she worked for the department of Agriculture in Washington, and she thinks that anything Mitch Daniels has done is wrong. Does that qualify her to be governor?